East Grand Lake Project - Permit issued

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has just  issued the permit for the East Grand Lake Project.  This project calls for 12 cuts, that will bring sand and silt deep into the swamps of the Atchafalaya Basin. 

 

Filling the Basin with sand and sediment reduces flood capacity.  Once flood capacity is lost, it can never be restored.  Maintaining the flood capacity in the Basin is crucial to protecting millions of people from Mississippi River Floods.

 

Atchafalaya Basinkeeper and our partners have been fighting this project for over 10 years.  Stopping this project will be our main priority for 2024.

Unanimous NO EGL!

Last night the Iberville Parish Council voted unanimously to pass a resolution against the East Grand Lake Project. We want to thank the entire council and specially Pete Kelly, Matt Jewel and Chasity Easley for their courage and integrity to move this forward. We all should be so proud of our councilmen and councilwomen!. For our children, always for them.

http://ibervilleparish.com/departments/council/videos 12/20/22 starting at 44:45

Iberville Resolution Link

‘Stop Filling Our Basin - No East Grand Lake Project’ Atchafalaya Basin Fishermen Send Message to Regulators at Public Hearing

Crawfishermen, parish councilmen and local advocates spoke in opposition to CPRA’s proposed East Grand Lake Project in the Basin at a public hearing in Iberville Parish last week 

(Plaquemine, LA) - Last week, the members of the public attended a public hearing to tell the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) they do not want the East Grand Lake Project constructed in the Atchafalaya Basin. Live testimony was offered in addition to the more than 2,000 individuals who have signed a petition in opposition to the project.

The Atchafalaya Basin Program’s East Grand Lake Project has been on the books for years but the applicant agency - the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA) - is now pushing for permits to construct. The contentious project proposes to make cuts in elevated banks and spoil piles to introduce river water into back swamps in the East Grand Lake area of the Flat Lake/Belle River water management units on the east side of the Atchafalaya Basin. CPRA claims the goal of the project is to improve water quality and forest health, but locals who  live, work and recreate in the Basin are all too familiar with promises like these to be convinced. 

Jody Meche

Public Official/Crawfisherman

Crawfishers and hunters who regularly navigate through the Basin told LDEQ they don’t want the project because, like other similar projects constructed in Buffalo Cove and Beau Bayou, rather than deliver fresh water to improve fisheries these projects divert sediment from introduced water and silt up the backswamps until they are no longer navigable by boat. A recurrent theme of the hearing was ‘what use is water quality if you can’t get there?’ “I hope that all of the opposition testimony against the EGL project offered at the public hearing will convince LDEQ not to certify this project for the sake of preserving our Atchafalaya Basin,” stated Jody Meche, commercial crawfishermen and president of the Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association-West. 

AtchafalayaBasinkeeper

Dean Wilson

Comments also were made to remind CPRA that the Basin is a spillway protecting much of coastal Louisiana from Mississippi River floods, Dean Wilson, Executive Director for Atchafalaya Basinkeeper said “floods from the filling of the Basin are already taking place, last year we experienced a historic flood from Bayou Sorrel and Bayou Pigeon all the way to Morgan City  because the Basin is filling in with sand and silt. The Basin is losing flood capacity in part because of projects like this, threatening our entire industrial corridor, the port of South Louisiana and millions of people from future Mississippi River floods. Irresponsible is not a strong enough word to describe projects like this”

Advocacy organizations working to protect the Basin, including Atchafalaya Basinkeeper and Delta Chapter of Sierra Club, as well as lawyers from the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic and General Russel Honoré also spoke in opposition of the project. General Honoré bemoaned the continued mismanagement of the Basin, to the benefit of special interest groups but to the detriment of the swamps and communities that rely on the Basin.


Of the few speakers in support of the project - including proponents of the project from The Nature Conservancy and the US Geological Survey - noticeably missing in action was the applicant agency, CPRA. Some of the attendees stated they showed up  to learn more about the project, the proposed activities and claimed benefits, but CPRA failed to deliver. The agency neither presented any information about the project nor offered public comment. Nevertheless, a few of the local fishermen opened the door for more communication, inviting the agencies to join them in the Basin and see what’s happening on the ground for themselves. 

It’s not too late to share your comment with the regulators! In addition to the public hearing, LDEQ will accept any written comments on the East Grand Lake project submitted by no later than January 9, 2023 at 4:30 pm. Information on how and where to submit written comments are provided below. 

—---------------------

To view the public notice for this project and LDEQ’s public hearing and comment period, visit the following link: https://edms.deq.louisiana.gov/app/doc/view?doc=13524783

The notice provides: “Comments on the water quality certification must be received by 4:30 pm CST, Monday, January 9, 2023. Delivery may be made to the drop-box at 602 N. 5th St., Baton Rouge, LA 70802. U.S. Mail may be sent to LDEQ, Public Participation Group, P.O. Box 4313, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4313. Emails may be submitted to DEQ.PUBLICNOTICES@LA.GOV and faxes sent to (225) 219-3309. Persons wishing to receive notice of the final water quality certification decision must include a complete mailing address when submitting comments. [and that] All correspondence should specify AI Number 210833, Water Quality Certification WQC 220609-01, and Activity Number CER20220001.” 

To learn more information about the East Grand Lake project, including public notices, background chronology, comments and expert opinions, visit Atchafalaya Basinkeeper’s ‘East Grand Lake’ page at the following link: https://www.basinkeeper.org/east-grand-lake

To sign onto the petition opposing the East Grand Lake Project, visit the following link: https://chng.it/NZy6hcLy

Contacts:

Dean Wilson, Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, (225) 692-4114





EGL Permit Application has been submitted for Public Comment

"The damage to the Basin from these projects are larger than the damage caused by cypress logging" Dean Wilson

The Atchafalaya Basin needs YOU!

On 4/25/2022, the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has released the opportunity for public comments on the East Grand Lake Project Permit.  There is only a 20 day window to get comments into the USACE.  At this time, Dean and Misha are working with others to draft our official legal comments on the behalf of Atchafalaya Basinkeeper.  We are contacting every alley and supporter for help.  This is where you come in.

There are many ways to help.  If you have not already, please sign the petition, Click here. (last Date to sign is May11, 2022)  Or better yet, send your own comments to the USACE.  Click here for full details.  Funding is also crucial at this time, we are in need of legal, expert witnesses and science funding.  Click Here to give.  

You may have other ways to help.  Education, please visit our website and learn more about this issue and what it means for the future of the Basin.  Network, tell others what is happening.  If you know of other groups, law firms, individuals or foundations that may care and may want to join in protection of the Basin, share our information.

The largest threat to the Atchafalaya Basin is sedimentation.  The more the sedimentation, the less able the Atchafalaya Basin is able to withstand floodwaters and protect millions of people from flooding.  The Basin has already lost many of its lakes, bayous and deep water habitat.  Our duty is to do our best, to not lose any more.  We have held this project at bay for over 10years.  Our goal has been and continues to be to stop this project completely.

ABK and others are greatly concerned about this project.  Please join us in protecting the Atchafalaya Basin and stay tuned in to the progress of our work.

Save the Louisiana Black Bear

Members of the Louisiana legislature have introduced a bill to require a bear hunting season in Louisiana beginning in 2023. Establishing a bear hunt before this unique subspecies has reached true recovery may well be the beginning of the end for the Louisiana black bear. 

Let’s hope that we can learn from the experience of our neighbors in Florida where, despite vocal opposition, the state authorized a bear hunt in 2015. At that time, there were roughly 4,000 black bears in Florida, and with interest from 3,776 hunters, over 300 bears were killed (including nursing mothers and juveniles) in just two days, requiring the state to call off the hunt earlier than planned. Afterwards, the public was overwhelmingly opposed to a future bear hunt in Florida and the state has not since reopened bear hunts. 

In Louisiana, we have nowhere near the bear population Florida did when it opened a hunt. Rather, the population of Louisiana black bears plummeted from over 80,000 to less than 500 Louisiana black bears estimated in 2016. In that same year, the bear was removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife as a result of decades of degraded habitat, illegal and incidental kills and hunting (which was legal in the state until 1988). Basinkeeper and partners have sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for prematurely delisting the Louisiana black bear without proving recovery of the subspecies and that case remains pending. The population estimates do not show healthy recovery. Two populations supporting true Louisiana black bears–one in the Tensas River Basin with 296 estimated bears and one in the Lower Atchafalaya River Basin with 164 estimated bears–are disconnected, and the population figures are not certain. With such few numbers and great distance separating these two populations, every bear is important to the survival of the subspecies. 

Not only should the bear not be hunted until it has reached true recovery–which certainly cannot be claimed with less than 500 Louisiana black bears remaining in two isolated populations–but a hunt should not be considered at least until the court decides whether the bear should remain protected under the Endangered Species Act. 

Please consider becoming a member or donating today to help fund this important work to protect the Louisiana black bear.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must evolve to meet the growing demands of climate-fueled flood risk

To meet climate-fueled flood risk, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must evolve. Basinkeeper and nearly 100 organizations sent a call to action urging the Corps to usher in a new era of comprehensive, and nature-based flood risk reduction: Protecting the Atchafalaya Basin is a must to protect us from catastrophic flooding. All river diversions to fill wetlands in the Basin away from the coast must stop and our environmental laws must be enforced.

To read the letter to the USACE click here

Service Proposes Delisting 23 Species from Endangered

Date: September 29, 2021

Contact: Brian Hires, (703) 358-2191, brian_hires@fws.gov

 

Service Proposes Delisting 23 Species from Endangered

Species Act Due to Extinction 

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing to remove 23 species from the Endangered Species Act (ESA) due to extinction. Based on rigorous reviews of the best available science for each of these species, the Service has determined these species are extinct, and thus no longer require listing under the ESA.

The purpose of the ESA is to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. For the species proposed for delisting today, the protections of the ESA came too late, with most either extinct, functionally extinct, or in steep decline at the timing of listing.

“With climate change and natural area loss pushing more and more species to the brink, now is the time to lift up proactive, collaborative, and innovative efforts to save America's wildlife. The Endangered Species Act has been incredibly effective at preventing species from going extinct and has also inspired action to conserve at-risk species and their habitat before they need to be listed as endangered or threatened,” said Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland. “We will continue to ensure that states, Tribes, private landowners, and federal agencies have the tools they need to conserve America’s biodiversity and natural heritage.”

These species extinctions highlight the importance of the ESA and efforts to conserve species before declines become irreversible. The circumstances of each also underscore how human activity can drive species decline and extinction, by contributing to habitat loss, overuse and the introduction of invasive species and disease. The growing impacts of climate change are anticipated to further exacerbate these threats and their interactions. They also underscore ongoing conservation challenges of the Service. Almost 3 billion birds have been lost in North America since 1970. These extinctions highlight the need to take action to prevent further losses.

Stemming this extinction crisis is a central component of the Biden-Harris administration’s America the Beautiful initiative, a locally led and voluntary, nationwide effort to conserve, connect, and restore 30 percent of lands and waters by 2030. One of the initiative’s goals is to enhance wildlife habitat and improve biodiversity -- to keep species from reaching the point where they are in danger of extinction or are too far gone to save.

“The Service is actively engaged with diverse partners across the country to prevent further extinctions, recover listed species and prevent the need for federal protections in the first place,” said Martha Williams, Service Principal Deputy Director. “The Endangered Species Act has been incredibly successful at both preventing extinctions and at inspiring the diverse partnerships needed to meet our growing 21st century conservation challenges.” 

While protections were provided too late for these 23 species, the ESA has been successful at preventing the extinction of more than 99% of species listed. In total, 54 species have been delisted from the ESA due to recovery, and another 56 species have been downlisted from endangered to threatened. The Service’s current workplan includes planned actions that encompass 60 species for potential downlisting or delisting due to successful recovery efforts. 

Species being proposed for delisting include the ivory-billed woodpecker, Bachman’s warbler, two species of freshwater fishes, eight species of Southeastern freshwater mussels and eleven species from Hawaiʻi and the Pacific Islands.

Ivory-billed woodpecker - Once America’s largest woodpecker, it was listed in 1967 as endangered under the precursor to the ESA, the Endangered Species Preservation Act (ESPA). The last commonly agreed upon sighting of the ivory-billed woodpecker was in April 1944 on the Singer Tract in the Tensas River region of northeast Louisiana. Despite decades of extensive survey efforts throughout the southeastern U.S. and Cuba, it has not been relocated. Primary threats leading to its extinction were the loss of mature forest habitat and collection.

Bachman’s warbler - As early as 1953, Bachman’s warbler was one of the rarest songbirds in North America. When first listed in 1967 as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Preservation Act, the bird had not been seen in the U.S. since 1962. Last documented in Cuba in 1981, there have been no verifiable sightings in that country since then. The loss of mature forest habitat and widespread collection are the primary reasons for its extinction.

Eight species of freshwater mussels - Reliant on healthy streams and rivers with clean, reliable water, freshwater mussels are some of the most imperiled species in the U.S., home to about one-third of the world’s species of freshwater mussels. Mussels proposed for delisting due to extinction are all located in the Southeast, America’s biodiversity hot spot for freshwater mussels.  They are the: flat pigtoe (Mississippi), southern acornshell (Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee), stirrupshell (Alabama), upland combshell, (Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee), green-blossom pearly (Tennessee, Virginia), turgid-blossom pearly mussel (Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas), yellow-blossom pearly mussel (Tennessee, Alabama) and the tubercled-blossom pearly mussel (Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia, southern Ontario, Canada).

Hawaiʻi and the Pacific Islands Eleven species from Hawaiʻi and Guam are being proposed for delisting due to extinction, many of which had striking characteristics, such as the long curved beaks of the Kauai akialoa and nukupuʻu, the haunting call of the Kauai `o`o, and the brilliant colors of the Maui akepa and Molokai creeper. Species endemic to islands face a heightened risk of extinction due to their isolation and small geographic ranges. Hawaiʻi and the Pacific Islands are home to more than 650 species of plants and animals listed under the ESA. This is more than any other state, and most are found nowhere else in the world.

San Marcos gambusia – Listed on 1980, this freshwater fish was found in the slow-flowing section of the San Marcos River in Texas. The San Marcos gambusia had a limited historic range of occurrence and has not been found in the wild since 1983. Primary reasons for its extinction include habitat alteration due to groundwater depletion, reduced spring flows, bottom plowing and reduced aquatic vegetation, as well as hybridization with other species of gambusia.

Scioto madtom - Listed as endangered in 1975, the Scioto madtom was a fish species found in a small section of the Big Darby Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, in Ohio. The Scioto madtom was known to hide during the daylight hours under rocks or in vegetation and emerge after dark to forage along the bottom of the stream. Only 18 individuals of the madtom were ever collected with the last confirmed sighting in 1957. The exact cause of the Scioto madtom’s decline is unknown, but was likely due to modification of its habitat from siltation, industrial discharge into waterways and agricultural runoff. At the time of listing, two dams were proposed for Big Darby Creek, though ultimately they were never constructed.

Species proposed for delisting due to extinction:

Species Name Where Found When Listed Last Confirmed Sighting

Bachman’s warbler FL, SC 1967 1988

Bridled white-eye (bird) GU (Guam) 1984 1983

Flat pigtoe mussel AL, MS 1987 1984

Green-blossom pearly mussel TN, VA 1984 1982

Ivory-billed woodpecker AR 1967 1944

Kauai akialoa (bird) HI 1967 1969

Kauai nukupuu (bird) HI 1970 1899

Kauaʻi ʻōʻō (bird) HI 1967 1987

Large Kauai thrush (bird) HI 1970 1987

Little Mariana fruit bat GU (Guam) 1984 1968

Maui ākepa (bird) HI 1970 1988

Maui nukupuʻu (bird) HI 1970 1996

Molokai creeper (bird) HI 1970 1963

Phyllostegia glabra var. HI 1991 1914

lanaiensis (plant)

Po`ouli (bird) HI 1975 2004

San Marcos gambusia (fish)TX 1980 1983

Scioto madtom (fish) OH 1975 1957

Southern acornshell mussel AL, GA, TN 1993 1973

Stirrupshell mussel AL, MS 1987 1986

Tubercled-blossom AL, IL, IN, KY, 1976 1969

pearly mussel OH, TN, WV

Turgid-blossom AL, AR, MO, TN 1976 1972

pearly mussel

Upland combshell mussel AL, GA, TN 1993 mid-1980s

Yellow-blossom AL, TN 1985 1980s

pearly mussel

The Service seeks information, data, and comments from the public regarding this proposal to remove these 23 species from the ESA and declare them extinct. The proposed rule will be available in the Federal Register Reading Room on September 29, 2021 at https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection using the link found under the Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants section.

We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before December 29, 2021. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.

-FWS- 

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service works with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. For more information, visit www.fws.gov, or connect with us through any of these social media channels: Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube.

Low water under Basin Bridge?

We have received many questions as to why the water under the Atchafalaya Basin Bridge is so low. Here is a statement from Mayor Sherbin Collette of Henderson.

HENDERSON DRAWDOWN

From Henderson Mayor Sherbin Collette

 

Wildlife and Fisheries is the deciding agency for drawing down Henderson Lake.

Water levels in Henderson Lake are being lowered for the yearly drawdown to a level of six (6) feet.  The reason for the drawdown is to control water hyacinth, hydrilla, and giant salvinia which is bad for the future of the lake.  In many areas of the state, drawdowns are very successful.  The drawdown began August 2nd and, if possible, will continue until November 1st.   The drawdown can only happen when river levels allow it.  We have dodged storms this year to allow this to happen.

          Keeping water levels as low as we can during hurricane season in Henderson Lake helps in preventing flooding in many places.  Working together with St. Landry, Lafayette, and Iberia parishes we have proven lowering water levels prior to storms heading our way has proven successful in the past.  As soon as we hear of a storm heading to the Gulf of Mexico we start our conference calls.  It is very important to prepare early as this has proven in the past to be very helpful.  A yearly drawdown in the lake has proven helpful in many ways.

Lawsuit Seeks Protections for Louisiana Black Bears

July 19, 2021

In an ongoing legal drive to restore Endangered Species Act protections to the iconic but star-crossed Louisiana black bear, a coalition of local and national conservationists today filed motion for summary judgement in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

In March 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had removed the bear, known popularly as the "Teddy Bear" and scientifically as subspecies luteolus, from its List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Amidst an outpouring of self-congratulations and publicity, joined in at the highest levels of state and national government, a great conservation victory was proclaimed. Not mentioned was that a reluctant FWS had been pressured through a decade-long battle and finally a lawsuit before listing the bear in 1992. The very same parties who led that earlier struggle are plaintiffs in the new suit.

Listing saved the bear. With protection of luteolus and its habitat, coupled with the efforts of dedicated federal and state biologists (and some continued outside prodding) bear numbers rebounded from a low of around 100 and breeding range increased. Then, FWS began a complex program that supposedly would lead to recovery of the subspecies but that is more likely to spell its doom.

FWS subsequently claimed to have met its key criteria for recovery:  two "viable" populations of luteolus connected by suitable habitat allowing the two to merge and interbreed. One such population was in the Tensas River Basin (TRB) of northeastern Louisiana, the other in the Upper Atchafalaya River Basin (UARB) in the central part of the state. "Connection" had resulted from a 2001–2009 program to artificially translocate some TRB bears to an area between the two populations, known as the Three Rivers Complex (TRC). UARB bears moved into the TRC and interbreeding began. The plan had worked!

There was only one problem.  The UARB bears were not true Louisiana luteolus. They were descended from bears of another subspecies, caught at Minnesota garbage dumps in the 1960s and brought to the UARB by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries for sport hunting. When FWS proposed delisting in May 2015, it tried to pass off the UARB bears as just another population of luteolus

Comments on the proposal noted that the very authorities relied upon by FWS for genetic confirmation  of viability and interbreeding had also shown that the UARB had no surviving bear population prior to the 1960s and that the bears there now were closely related to those in Minnesota. FWS then admitted as much, but suggested that the mere possibility that a few native bears had wandered into the UARB somehow converted the whole population there to luteolus. FWS has held to that absurdity, though further DNA studies have confirmed the Minnesota origin of the UARB population.

FWS has never attempted to calculate an estimate of original range and numbers. One may ask how there can be claim of recovery without any idea of what there was originally. Nonetheless, data right from documentation compiled by FWS shows former range was at least 118,000 square miles and numbers at least 80,000. That compares to about 1,800 square miles today, with approximately 296 bears in the TRB and 164 in another historic population in the Lower Atchafalaya River Basin (LARB). FWS has claimed that one more population of Louisiana black bear has been re-established in western Mississippi, but the recent DNA research shows most bears there migrated from a non-luteolus group in Arkansas. Disregarding the Mississippi, the alien UARB, and the hybridized TRC groups, the only existing true Louisiana black bear populations are those of the TRB and LARB.

Incredibly, FWS seems prepared to write off the LARB population and does not even consider it "significant." Yet it is larger than the alien UARB group and contains about a third of all true luteolus. FWS acknowledges it faces many "threats," yet argues it is not "threatened." It has been especially hard hit by the delisting, as formerly restricted commercial and agricultural activity in its habitat again is increasing. Ancient cypress and tupelo trees, ideal for bear dens, are being cut down, and danger is posed by further development and traffic along Highway 90 and future eastward extension of Interstate 49 on that same route. Loss of habitat by the LARB population and the imminent loss of genetic integrity by the TRB population are a devastating combination for the last Louisiana black bears.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association West, Sierra Club and its Delta Chapter, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), Healthy Gulf, and individuals Dr. Michael J. Caire, Ronald M. Nowak, and Harold Schoeffler, the last of whom petitioned for the bear’s listing in 1987. The plaintiffs include avid hunters and fishermen who live and recreate in bear habitat, but who understand that it is not presently possible to ethically hunt the Louisiana black bear with such low numbers and substantial threats remaining.

Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment

Supporting Attachments No. 51-1

Supporting Attachments No. 51-2

Supporting Attachments No. 51-3

Supporting Attachments No. 51-4

Supporting Attachments No. 51-5

Supporting Attachments No. 51-6

Supporting Attachments No. 51-7

Supporting Attachments No. 51-8

LOUISIANA GROUPS RAISE CONCERN OVER SAFARI CLUB’S INCLUSION IN LAWSUIT TO PROTECT THE BLACK BEAR

Last fall, Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association West, Healthy Gulf, Sierra Club and its Delta Chapter, with three individual plaintiffs, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2016 decision to remove the Louisiana black bear from the U.S. List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife under the Endangered Species Act. The Plaintiffs challenge the Service’s delisting decision and finding that the bear has recovered, despite continued threats such as habitat loss and unnatural hybridization with non-native bears.

Meanwhile, Safari Club International – an international organization advocating for the right to hunt – seeks to intervene in the case to support the Service’s decision to delist the Louisiana black bear. Plaintiffs’ have opposed Safari Club’s intervention, raising concerns that potential future hunts are not at issue in this case addressing whether the agency’s delisting decision is supported by law and the best scientific data available.  Plaintiffs include individuals and organization members that are themselves avid hunters. Jody Meche, president of LCPA-West, a plaintiff organization in the case, stated: “Most of our members have been hunting and fishing in the Atchafalaya Basin since they were young; it’s part of our culture and our connection to the Basin.”

There has not been a legal hunt of black bears in Louisiana for many decades, and even since the 2016 delisting, a hunting season has not yet been opened for bears in Louisiana. Plaintiff Dr. Ron Nowak said: “The bear was listed in 1992, partly due to greatly reduced numbers from overhunting.  Listing helped it come back some, but numbers are nowhere near those in states that allow hunting of black bears.  Regardless, this case is not about hunting but about an agency ignoring both law and science to deceive the public for political proclivity."

Plaintiff Dr. Michael Caire said: “Louisiana’s sportsmen (not a gender specific word) have been at the forefront of protecting and enhancing our State’s and Nation’s wildlife resources even prior to Theodore Roosevelt becoming President. The issue is Federal mismanagement (intentional or otherwise) that threatens the integrity of the Endangered Species Act.”

Dean Wilson, executive director for Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, a plaintiff organization, said: “I find it morally repugnant that groups like Safari Club put pressure on our government to hunt species with so few individuals left. Safari Club’s interests are not compatible with the reality that still faces the bear in Louisiana today, where as few as 500 individuals may remain and face threats to their survival. I believe in ethical and sustainable hunting, and I hope that this case will result in adequate protection and management of the bear to allow its population numbers to grow to support possible hunting in the future. But we’re not there yet.”

Motion to Intervene of Safari Club International

Memorandum in support of Safari Clun International’s Motion to Intervene

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition

More information on the Black Bear Litigation

Embed Block
Add an embed URL or code. Learn more